I like what I've seen so far from Richard MacManus and

My issue, and the impetus for me to be sarcastic towards Richard's post, is that earlier this morning I'd screamed at a talkingHead on my TV for doing the same thing... essentially.
It was a lawyer friend of a lawyer who's wife had recently been murdered. He had no news to add or even information to offer that would clairify what had already been reported. He just grabbed some faceTime to do the lawyers' twoStep about onGoing investigations and not being to elaborate.
It's bad enough that TV Journalists are already interviewing each other for filler when they don't actually have any real sources or information lined up. Whatever happened to that line between reporting the news and being the news?
O.K., this is where I admit that I'm probably sociopathic, and just needed to vent my spleen. But,(!) I'll offer for evidence this quote that appears to me to be nothing more than an attention grab and a shameless plug for peers.
...I've downloaded it and will give it a go as my
main browser for a while. I won't however jump to conclusions and give
you a half-baked review right now. But fear not, for there are plenty
of great reviews around - including from members of the Web 2.0 Workgroup: TechCrunch, WeBreakStuff, SolutionWatch, Dion Hinchcliffe. ZDNet Aussie has a good write-up too.
I hope someone gets the OPML list updating thing figured out soon. I just noticed that they've added numerous authors/sites to the workGroup!
Categories: syndicNation, iRobt, Flock, read/WriteWeb, issues, socialPositioning,